| |
⚡ TOGETHER WITH MARKETBEAT |
One database sits inside all three big clouds. |
MarketBeat's report opens on a database provider embedded across the three major cloud platforms, which puts it in front of roughly 90% of the market. Also named: the chip maker holding 80% of the AI data center market, a voice specialist they treat as an acquisition target, and a data infrastructure name. Seven in total. |
|
|
Free report. Not investment advice. All investing involves risk of loss and past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
🗂️ Nothing that mattered this week traded |
The tape sold the theater between four and eight percent through Thursday. The contract layer under it did not move at all. |
| |
⚡ THE SETUP |
FERC issued show cause orders on 18 June under Docket RM26-4-000 to all six RTOs and ISOs and their transmission owners, on large-load interconnection. The Commission's 16 July directive gives NERC until 31 December 2026 to file reliability standards covering computational loads. The Department of War awarded NODA AI $100 million for autonomy software across the Joint Force, following a $10 million July award to the same vendor, per Defence Blog. SPECIAL REPORT AI firms are paying $55,000 for land that used to trade at $500. Stansberry's case is that the position is a tollbooth on both the oil and the AI build-out. See the position (Ad) Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investing involves risk of loss including total loss of principal. Not investment advice.
|
|
|
|
|
Docket RM26-4-000 had no price on Thursday. It has a number, six respondents and a compliance clock that started on 18 June. Nothing about it moved this week, and that is the point. |
Price did move. Measured from Friday 14 August's close to Thursday 20 August's, SMH gave back 4.28%, Arista 7.58%, Vistra 6.20%. Micron held at plus 0.27% after a 7.02% Tuesday. Five sessions of repricing, and not one company in that group reported a quarter of its own during them. |
| |
📊 BY THE NUMBERS |
|
|
RTOs and ISOs ordered to justify or rewrite their large-load rules |
|
|
|
|
Department of War award to NODA AI for autonomy software |
|
|
|
|
NERC deadline for computational-load reliability standards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underneath the tape, the layer that actually books the demand did not tick. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's show cause orders to all six RTOs and ISOs, issued 18 June under RM26-4-000, are still inside their compliance window. The Commission's 16 July directive to NERC still sets 31 December for reliability standards covering computational loads. The Department of War's autonomy award to NODA AI is still one hundred million dollars, and per Defence Blog it follows a ten million dollar July award to the same vendor. |
| |
📡 // THE PROCUREMENT FILE |
FERC, Docket RM26-4-000, 18 June. Show cause orders to all six RTOs and ISOs and their transmission owners, covering cost recovery agreements with large load customers, expedited study for co-located generation, and transmission service written for large loads. Compliance filings run roughly sixty days out. |
FERC to NERC, 16 July. New or modified reliability standards for computational loads on the bulk power system, due 31 December 2026. |
Department of War to NODA AI, $100 million. Autonomy software across the Joint Force. Follows a $10 million July award for orchestration software on the LUCAS drone program. |
|
|
|
|
Three documents, three different bodies, and not one of them repriced this week. |
| |
Price discovers a theater in five sessions. Procurement takes a quarter, and procurement is the side that signs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of that is a forecast. It is a description of who is sitting on the other side of the order. |
| |
🔧 THE SECOND DERIVATIVE |
What the buyer is becoming |
For three years the demand under this build-out was commercial. Hyperscaler capital spending, disclosed quarterly, revised on a call. The documents above are a different kind of demand. They carry docket numbers, named respondents, statutory deadlines and, on the defense side, a ceiling value and a period of performance. Federal News Network put the Accenture Federal Services award for the Pentagon's AI data platform at up to $821 million over five years, awarded in late July. That is a five-year obligation rather than a quarterly guide. |
The consequence is a change in what a supplier's backlog is worth. A backlog built from cloud orders reprices when the cloud customer's stock does, which is roughly what happened to this board between Friday and Thursday. A backlog built from a period-of-performance contract does not. Any name that shifts meaningful revenue from the first kind to the second earns a lower discount rate on the same dollars, and none of that shows up in a Thursday close. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifteen trillion dollars picked a side (Ad) |
Sovereign wealth funds now manage a record $15 trillion, and The Oxford Club's brief says AI is a core priority inside it. Norway screens every portfolio company daily with language models. Abu Dhabi built it into the financial system. Read the brief |
Paid advertisement on behalf of The Oxford Club, 105 W. Monument Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. Track records described are the advertiser's own and prices are split adjusted. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investing involves risk of loss including total loss of principal. Not investment advice. |
|
|
| |
🥊 THE COUNTER |
The counter is size, and it renders. One hundred million dollars and eight hundred and twenty one million dollars set against hyperscaler capital spending measured in tens of billions a quarter is a rounding error. Six RTO compliance filings do not build a megawatt. Anyone reading federal procurement as the marginal buyer of AI compute is reading noise as a trend. This argument stands on contract structure and duration, and if that leg fails there is nothing else under it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The names that sold off while everyone watched the listing (Ad) |
Stocks To Trade's read on the aftermath of the largest listing in market history, and the instruments that moved around it. See their read |
Results are not typical and most traders lose money. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All trading involves risk of loss including total loss of principal. Not investment advice. |
|
|
| |
📋 // COLLECTION PRIORITIES |
Monday 24 August. A normal full session. The next US market holiday is 7 September. |
RM26-4-000 compliance filings. From the RTOs and their transmission owners. Cost allocation first, megawatt tables second. |
NERC. Any posting on computational-load standards ahead of the 31 December date. |
Defense award cadence. NODA followed its own July award inside five weeks, so the interval is the datapoint rather than the headline number. |
|
|
|
|
Knox Bennett, AI Arms Race |
P.S. Name the filing you would read first when the RM26-4-000 compliance documents post. Reply with the docket or the operator, whichever you actually track. |
P.P.S. Stansberry reads Elon Musk's AI plans out of a public filing rather than a press release, which is at least the right document to be arguing over. See what they pulled out of it (Ad) Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investing involves risk of loss including total loss of principal. Not investment advice. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
AI ARMS RACE
A Guardian Financial Publishing title |
WHY YOU’RE RECEIVING THIS EMAIL
You’re receiving this email because at some point, you opted in to receive updates, news, or information on a specific topic we’ve previously discussed or shared. Whether it was through a subscription, a form submission, or another form of communication, your information was shared willingly, and we respect your decision to connect with us.
Thank you for taking the time to read this. This message is part of an ongoing conversation between us, and we want you to have full transparency about why you received it, how your information is handled, and what to expect from future emails. |
SUBSCRIPTION & DELIVERY
Your subscription is confirmed and your delivery preferences are up to date. You are currently receiving content based on the schedule and frequency associated with your registration. If you need to adjust your delivery window, change your email frequency, or pause updates temporarily, reply to this message and our team will process your request within one business day. A confirmation of your original registration is available upon request. |
UNSUBSCRIBING OR MANAGING YOUR PREFERENCES
Everyone’s inbox is different. If you ever find our emails no longer relevant, there’s no hard feelings — use the unsubscribe link at the bottom of this email and it takes effect on the first click. If you’d rather adjust what you receive than leave entirely, reply with the word PREFERENCES and our team will help you tailor your delivery.
We don’t use tricks or gimmicks to keep you subscribed. Our priority is that these emails add value to your day, and if they don’t, we respect your decision to part ways. |
CONTACTING US
Questions about your subscription or anything you read here? Reply to this email or write to contact@guardian.pub. Mail can be sent to Stable Financial Publishing, 1013 Centre Road, Suite 403-D, Wilmington, DE 19805. We read every reply. |
CONTENT DISCLAIMER
AI Arms Race is for informational and educational purposes only and is not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal, and past performance does not guarantee future results. We publish analysis of supply chains, capital spending, and the companies inside them — we do not issue buy or sell calls and we do not set price targets. What you do with your own money is your decision. |
SOURCING AND ATTRIBUTION
Our analysis is written from primary facts — filings, contracts, earnings figures, agency data, and reporting from outlets we name. When a fact comes from another publication we say so in the text and link the original article so you can read it yourself. Quotes are reproduced accurately and attributed. Figures are drawn from named sources and stated with their context.
If you believe we’ve published something incorrectly, reply with the detail and the source. We check it and print the correction. |
HOW WE MAKE MONEY
AI Arms Race is free to read. We keep it that way by including paid advertisements and affiliate links in some emails. If you click a link or make a purchase, we may receive compensation from the advertiser at no cost to you. Sponsored placements never change our editorial views, and every paid placement is labeled where it appears. |
PAYMENTS & FRAUD PROTECTION
We will never ask you to provide payment card numbers, bank account details, or login credentials by email. Any message requesting this information should be considered fraudulent and reported to our team immediately. If you have a question about a purchase made through us, reply within 30 days of the transaction date and a member of our team will provide your records. |
REPORTING SUSPICIOUS EMAILS
If you receive a message claiming to be from AI Arms Race or Guardian Financial Publishing that looks suspicious, do not click any links in it. Forward it to our support team so we can investigate and protect other readers. |
PRIVACY & DATA HANDLING
We take your privacy seriously and we do not sell your personal information. This section describes how we collect, use, and protect it; full details are in the Privacy Policy linked below.
What we collect. The information you give us at signup or later by reply — typically your email address, and sometimes your name or phone number. We also receive technical information when you open an email or visit one of our pages, including IP address, browser and device type, and operating system. Our emails contain tracking pixels and tagged links that tell us whether a message was opened and which links were clicked, which is how we measure what is worth sending.
How we use it. To deliver the content you signed up for, respond to your inquiries, maintain your subscription records, and improve what we publish.
Service providers. We use outside vendors to send email, host pages, and measure performance. These providers process data on our behalf, under contract, and only for the purposes described here. They are not permitted to use your information for their own purposes.
Your rights. You can ask what personal information we hold about you, correct it, or request that we delete it. Email contact@guardian.pub with your request and the address you subscribed with. Depending on where you live, you may have additional statutory rights, including under California, Colorado, and Virginia privacy law.
Children. This publication is intended for adults. We do not knowingly collect personal information from anyone under 13. If we learn that we have, we delete it promptly.
Changes. We may update this privacy policy occasionally. Changes will be reflected on the linked page. |
ACCESSIBILITY AND COMMUNICATION
If you have trouble accessing the unsubscribe page, managing preferences, or understanding why you’re receiving this email, reach out directly to our support team. We aim to respond within a reasonable time frame and address your concerns effectively.
Our communication is designed to be as inclusive as possible, but we know there’s always room for improvement. If you have feedback on how we can make our emails more accessible or relevant, please don’t hesitate to share. |
LEGAL INFORMATION
We comply with all applicable laws and regulations regarding email communication, including maintaining high standards for consent-based communication. Your trust matters, and we work to ensure every email you receive meets these requirements. If you need clarification on our compliance policies or legal obligations, please ask. |
A COMMITMENT TO NON-INTRUSIVE EMAILS
We aim to create a non-intrusive communication experience. We won’t overwhelm your inbox with excessive messages, and we work to keep our content clear and concise. If we ever fail to meet these standards, we encourage you to let us know.
Feedback, whether positive or constructive, is always appreciated. Your thoughts help us understand how we can do better. While we cannot promise every suggestion will be implemented, we take the time to review and consider your input. |
A FINAL NOTE
Email is one of the many ways we stay connected, but we understand it isn’t perfect for everyone. If there’s another way you’d prefer to hear from us, let us know — social, a different cadence, another channel entirely — and we’re open to finding what works.
Our goal is never to disrupt or clutter your inbox. Every email sent is intended to provide value, and we appreciate your time and attention. This footer was designed to ensure transparency, provide essential information, and give you full control over your communication preferences. We hope it meets your expectations, but if there’s anything you’d like to see improved, we’re always here to listen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This email may contain paid advertisements and affiliate links. Guardian Financial Publishing may receive compensation if you click a link or make a purchase. |
AI Arms Race is a publication of Guardian Financial Publishing (D/B/A) Stable Financial Publishing
Privacy Policy · Terms · Disclaimer |
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar