 Dear Reader, In a few short months, the US government could make a sweeping change to bank accounts nationwide. It will give them unprecedented powers to control your bank account. They could closely track every transaction... even freeze it. Fortunately, there are 4 simple steps you can take today that could safeguard your savings. Discover these 4 simple steps here. Good luck and God bless!
 |
Martin D. Weiss, PhD
Weiss Ratings Founder |
Exclusive Content
The Palantir Paradox—Record Numbers and a Stock That Won't CooperateWritten by Bridget Bennett. Publication Date: 5/21/2026. 
Key Points
- Palantir delivered what may be its strongest quarter ever as a public company, with 85% revenue growth, nearly 40% operating margins, and $8 billion in combined cash and short-term securities — numbers that directly contradict claims of competitive disruption
- The global shift away from stable supply chains and predictable alliances has made Palantir's core capability — turning operational chaos into actionable intelligence — one of the most valuable offerings in enterprise technology
- For investors holding Palantir now, preset profit-trimming rules tied to specific return thresholds can remove emotion from the decision entirely, while new investors should consider a slow, methodical entry rather than trying to chase the position size of early holders
- Special Report: After “33X” call, Jon Najarian reveals NEW Tesla prediction…
Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) just posted what may be the best quarter in its history as a public company. Revenue grew 85%, operating margins are approaching 50%, the company holds $8 billion in combined cash and short-term securities, and there are no obvious signs of stress anywhere in the business. Yet the stock sold off anyway. For investors trying to make sense of that reaction, one of the earliest retail bulls on the name says it isn't a mystery — and it isn't a warning. When Great Earnings Aren't EnoughThe market's short-term behavior has always been a poor predictor of business quality. Long-term Palantir bull Tom Nash, who has followed the company since its public debut, put it plainly: in the short run, the market is a voting machine. In the long run, it's a weighing machine, a line he credits to Benjamin Graham.
A stock priced for perfection, like Palantir, will often sell off even when it delivers perfection. High expectations were already baked into the earnings report. Some investors took profits and moved on. That's not panic — it's rational portfolio management. Nash pointed to Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN) as a parallel case: a company that blows out earnings while still lagging the broader S&P 500, largely misunderstood by the market in the short term. Mispricing is more common than investors tend to acknowledge. Why the Global Chaos Trade Favors PalantirNash spent years underweighting Palantir's government business in his thesis. That view changed as the global investment environment shifted. The AI arms race among governments is accelerating, and the U.S. Department of Defense has a historically consistent preference for a single primary supplier when it comes to mission-critical data infrastructure. That supplier is effectively Palantir. The broader geopolitical deterioration — supply chain fragmentation, alliance instability, and the collapse of predictable globalization — plays directly into what Palantir does best. The company was built for chaos. Its Foundry platform was originally developed from a 2017 engagement with Airbus, which was running 17 factories across five countries and two continents, falling behind on the A350, and facing potential lawsuits. Palantir helped increase production by 20% while improving quality. That's not just a software company. That's a chaos-to-clarity engine — and that product is now one of the most critical assets in global commerce. The AI Disruption Argument Doesn't Hold Up to the NumbersThe narrative that AI will eat Palantir's lunch is worth examining honestly. It's a fair question to ask about any enterprise software company. Fiverr International (NYSE: FVRR), monday.com (NASDAQ: MNDY), and Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) are all facing legitimate pressure from AI-driven displacement of traditional SaaS functions. Palantir looks different in practice. Nash's framework for evaluating disruption is simple: look at the numbers. If a company is losing ground, you'd expect to see revenue growth slow, margins compress, and debt rise. None of those conditions exist at Palantir. Q1 2026 revenue came in at $1.63 billion, an 85% year-over-year increase and the fastest top-line growth the company has posted since its 2020 direct listing — the 11th consecutive quarter of revenue acceleration. Operating margins are at all-time highs. Debt has declined from roughly $450 million to around $212 million, while the cash and short-term securities position has grown to approximately $8 billion. As MarketBeat has noted, being right about Palantir's valuation and being right about the stock are two very different things. The competitive threat from large AI labs is real, but it has precedent. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) launched Fabric directly into Palantir's territory. The result: Microsoft pulled back and moved toward partnership rather than competition. Displacing Palantir at the enterprise level is not a packaging problem. It's a domain expertise problem that took decades to build. What to Actually Do With the StockFor investors who have been holding Palantir since the single-digit years, Nash follows a pure buy-and-hold strategy with one hard rule: he sells only when the thesis breaks. For most investors, he recommends building in predetermined trim rules before emotions enter the picture — something like trimming 10% at 50% unrealized gains, 20% at 100%, and 30% at 150%. The logic is that it creates a win regardless of which direction the stock moves next. For investors considering Palantir today, Nash's view is that the best time to plant a tree was in 2020, but the second-best time is now — provided you approach it deliberately. Trying to catch up to early position sizes by going in fast tends to create the worst possible outcome: entering at a high, hitting a routine pullback, and making an emotional decision from a place of confusion. A slow, fixed weekly entry removes that variable entirely. The thesis breaks, in Nash's view, on three events: Alex Karp's departure, a genuine competitive displacement reflected in the financial data, or a significant loss of government contract concentration. Watch the margins and the revenue trajectory, as those numbers will signal deterioration well before the headlines do.
. |
