 The old way to retire is to pile up a huge sum, then slowly spend it down and pray it lasts. That's a frightening way to live. In fact, nearly 2 in 3 Americans now say they fear running out of money more than they fear dying. I don't blame them. When you're draining your savings to pay the bills, every dip in the market feels like a threat! But what if you never had to touch your principal? What if your money threw off enough monthly income to live on while staying right where it is? And here's the kicker: Instead of needing the $1.5 million advisors quote… There's a new way to potentially reach your retirement income goal with 10x less money → After helping people build retirement income for decades… I've learned the giant nest-egg number is the wrong thing to chase. The best part? It's not some complicated trading system. It's as simple as buying a single stock — one click in your brokerage account. I walk through exactly how it works in a short presentation. ⇒ Watch now: how to reach your retirement income goal without a seven-figure nest egg → Tim Plaehn You may be a lot closer to your number than anyone ever told you. P.S. What's the monthly income you'd need to never worry about money again? $3,000? $5,000? Maybe more? Whatever that number is — that's your retirement income goal. And it's the only retirement number that actually matters. Not the million-dollar nest egg. Not the giant portfolio. The monthly income. And it may take far less to reach than you think. See how here →
Bonus News from MarketBeat Media
Microsoft Bets on In-House AI to Cut OpenAI and Anthropic CostsAuthor: Chris Markoch. First Published: 7/12/2026. 
Key Points
- Microsoft is routing some Excel and Outlook prompts to its own MAI models instead of OpenAI or Anthropic to cut costs and improve margins.
- Microsoft is hedging its AI dependency through a three-way approach involving OpenAI, Anthropic's Claude, and its own in-house MAI models.
- Despite falling about 20% year-to-date, MSFT trades near 22 times forward earnings with a bullish analyst consensus and a price target well above its current level.
- Special Report: Buy this stock tomorrow
Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) has taken steps to reduce its reliance on frontier AI models, though this is not an outright declaration of protest. In June, the tech giant launched its own proprietary AI models (Microsoft AI, or MAI) across select applications in its Office suite. What that means for the user experience remains an open question, but it is clearly a margin play for Microsoft. The company competes in multiple areas of the AI infrastructure buildout, making this move about controlling the controllables.
Rather than suffering death by a thousand cuts from OpenAI and Anthropic, the frontier model providers, Microsoft is trying to widen its existing moat and deliver stronger returns on investment (ROI) from its AI spending. But will that be enough to improve sentiment toward MSFT, which has declined approximately 20% year-to-date? Microsoft Expands MAI to Reduce Reliance on OpenAIHere's the news behind the news. Bloomberg reported that Microsoft is quietly routing some Excel and Outlook prompts to MAI, its in-house model family, rather than to OpenAI or Anthropic. Tens of thousands of prompts a week are already running on Microsoft's own technology. That's still a small slice of total Copilot traffic. OpenAI and Anthropic handle most of it today. But the direction of travel matters more than the current split, and Microsoft has made its intentions clear. At Build 2026 in June, Microsoft unveiled seven MAI models, including its first reasoning model, MAI-Thinking-1. The company says it matches Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6 on coding tasks. AI chief Mustafa Suleyman put it bluntly: "We pay a lot of money to Anthropic, so our goal is to reduce and ultimately eliminate that cost." How Microsoft's In-House AI Could Boost Profit MarginsFor investors, an easy way to think about this is as follows. Copilot is a $30-per-seat subscription that, prior to the MAI launch, was running on top of someone else's expensive AI model by default. Every prompt costs Microsoft money to process, and multiplied across hundreds of millions of Office users, that bill adds up fast. Owning the model instead of renting it changes the equation entirely. Microsoft doesn't need MAI to win over every customer. It just needs MAI to be good enough for everyday spreadsheet formulas and email drafts, at a fraction of the cost. That's the ROI story. Microsoft won’t win an AI arms race on raw intelligence. But it can compete more efficiently by converting a rented cost center into owned infrastructure. Microsoft Uses MAI to Strengthen Its AI Competitive MoatMicrosoft chief executive officer (CEO) Satya Nadella has reportedly said he feared Microsoft becoming "the next IBM.” By that, he meant a company that let someone else own the most important layer of technology. MAI is Microsoft's answer to that fear. Instead of a single point of AI dependency, Microsoft now runs a three-way hedge. It holds a stake in OpenAI, embeds Anthropic's Claude in Copilot, and increasingly leans on its own models where the economics make sense. That flexibility is arguably a bigger moat than any one model's benchmark score. It also insulates Microsoft from a ticking clock. Microsoft's current discounted OpenAI pricing won't last forever, and that deal isn't set to expire until 2032. Building a credible in-house alternative now gives Microsoft leverage in any future renegotiation, rather than leaving it stuck paying whatever OpenAI or Anthropic decides to charge. The Bear Case: Risks to Microsoft's AI StrategyBefore getting too bullish, a few caveats are worth weighing. This shift is still incremental, and Microsoft hasn't published any timeline for expanding it further. Most Copilot workloads still run on outside models today. There's also a quality question. Microsoft's own materials frame MAI as matching prior-generation Anthropic models, not necessarily the current large language models (LLMs). If MAI-powered features feel noticeably worse, customer goodwill could take a hit that outweighs the cost savings. What It Means for OpenAI and AnthropicThis is a warning shot worth watching. Anthropic filed confidentially for an IPO in June, and OpenAI is reportedly preparing a similar filing. Their biggest enterprise distribution partner is now also a competitor, building cheaper in-house alternatives. That doesn't mean OpenAI or Anthropic are in immediate trouble. Both still handle the bulk of Copilot's AI traffic, and Microsoft has made it clear that it isn't ending either partnership. But the "picks and shovels" trade just got a little more complicated for anyone betting purely on third-party AI labs staying indispensable. Microsoft Stock Rebounds After Hitting a 52-Week LowMicrosoft hit a 52-week low in late June. The 10% bounce off that level isn’t a sign that everything is perfect, but it does suggest that investors are leaning into the stock’s value proposition. At around 22x forward earnings, Microsoft is trading at a discount to the S&P 500 and to its own history. An argument could be made that MSFT wasn’t overvalued when the sell-off began in November, and there’s ample reason to believe it’s undervalued now. The relative strength indicator reached oversold territory when MSFT bottomed in June. 
But the bigger story comes from analysts and institutions. The MSFT consensus price target of $559.84 is approximately 45% below its recent trading range. Plus, out of 48 analysts tracked by MarketBeat, 41 give MSFT a Buy rating, and seven rate it a Hold. Analysts notoriously don’t like to be wrong, which may explain why some have trimmed their price targets, but the overall sentiment remains bullish. The same cautious optimism can be found in its institutional ownership. There's no question that buying has slowed in the first two quarters of the year. But buying still outpaces selling, and with MSFT at 22x earnings, this could be an attractive target for money that hasn’t left the market and is looking for growth in the second half. . |
