June 26, 2026

I Called Nvidia in 2016 Here's My Next Call.

Featured: The Dow Hit a Record. The Nasdaq Didn't.

The Dow Hit a Record. The Nasdaq Didn't.

Something happened this week that most investors are reading backwards.

The S&P 500 slid nearly 2% on the week. The Nasdaq fell 4.6% across five consecutive losing sessions. The Dow outperformed, rising 0.6% week to date, and on Thursday it touched a new intraday record of 52,655.66. That is not a broad market breakdown. That is capital moving from one address to another.

The typical reaction to that kind of headline divergence is to call it a sell-off and move on. That framing misses what is actually happening and where institutional money is moving with real conviction.

The Breadth Story Nobody Is Covering

The most important data point this week was not any individual stock. It was this: advancing shares outnumbered decliners in the S&P 500 even on Tuesday and Wednesday when the overall index fell. That is improved breadth. Investors are rotating out of tech and into other sectors, which suggests the market may not depend so much on a narrow sliver of stocks to propel things higher.

By late Thursday, 63% of S&P 500 stocks were trading above their 50-day moving average, up from 50% at the start of June. Breadth expanding while the Nasdaq contracts is the opposite of what a broad market breakdown looks like. Capital is not leaving equities. It is moving within equities.

On Thursday alone, six of the eleven GICS sectors rose. Gains were led by industrials, up 2.19%. Healthcare and materials were second and third, gaining 1.49% and 1.39%, respectively. That kind of sector dispersion -- old-economy sectors rising on the same day tech falls -- is not panic. It is positioning.

The Fed Signal That Changes Everything

Here is the part worth slowing down on, because the market has not fully processed it yet.

Neel Kashkari came into 2026 viewed as one of the Fed's more dovish policymakers. That reputation is exactly what makes Friday's statement so significant. Speaking at the Aspen Ideas Festival, Minneapolis Federal Reserve President Kashkari said he has changed his outlook and now expects one interest rate increase will be necessary this year.

"In March, I had penciled in one rate cut by the end of the year. In June, I've changed that to one rate hike by the end of the year," he said. And he did not stop at energy prices. "I'm concerned about inflation, and it's not only tied to what's happening in the Middle East, it's just the impression of broader inflationary pressures in the economy." He flagged tariffs, fertilizer disruption from the Strait of Hormuz, and massive investment in data centers as drivers -- noting that anything touching those sectors is seeing prices skyrocket.

This did not happen in isolation. Kashkari's comments came roughly a week after the Fed's June 17 policy meeting, where officials voted 12-0 to hold interest rates between 3.50% and 3.75%. Of the 18 officials who submitted dot-plot projections, nine now expect at least one rate hike in 2026. The median forecast moved to 3.8%, up from 3.4% in March. New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh did not submit his own dot, consistent with his long-held skepticism about forward guidance.

The data behind that shift is not ambiguous. Core PCE -- the Fed's preferred inflation measure -- came in at 3.4% in May, its highest since October 2023. The all-items PCE reading hit a 4.1% annual rate, its highest level since April 2023. Inflation has now accelerated for four consecutive months.

Slight tangent, but it matters: markets have September circled as the most likely date for a first hike. That is a different macro regime than investors were pricing three months ago, and the portfolio implications are not subtle.

Who Benefits and Why It Is Not Random

Higher-for-longer rates do specific things to specific businesses. They compress the present value of long-duration growth stocks. They benefit companies with pricing power, stable cash flows, short-duration earnings, and the ability to pass costs through to end markets.

The sector data is already reflecting that. Year-to-date, consumer staples are up roughly 15%, industrials are up around 12%, and energy stocks have climbed approximately 21% since January. Technology, communication services, and consumer cyclicals have been the laggards. As investors look for stability outside of AI-heavy mega caps, real-economy stocks are pulling ahead.

The same session that saw chip stocks crater on Tuesday, non-chipmaker tech names like Microsoft and Amazon -- as well as defensives like Walmart, Procter & Gamble, and Johnson & Johnson -- rose. Visa and Walmart each added more than 2% on Friday. Eli Lilly soared 7% after the EU backed the use of its leukemia therapy. These are not random bounces. They are the fingerprint of a rotation with institutional backing.

Healthcare deserves separate attention. The sector is structurally supported by demographic trends, an aging population, and consistent demand characteristics that tend to hold up during periods of economic uncertainty. Drug pipeline catalysts are landing well in this environment, as the Eli Lilly move on Friday illustrated.

Consumer Sentiment and What It Is Actually Saying

The rotation is partly a consumer story, too. And not the one most people are telling.

The University of Michigan's final June consumer sentiment reading came in at 49.5, up from May's record-setting low of 44.8 -- but still the second-lowest reading in data going back to the 1970s. Economists had forecast 50.0. The June rebound snapped a three-month run of declines, but sentiment remains 13% below its February 2026 level, before the Iran conflict started, and nearly 20% below a year ago.

What is interesting is the inflation expectations split. Near-term: one-year expectations dipped to 4.6% from 4.8% in May, still well above February's 3.4% reading. Longer-term: the five-to-ten-year inflation outlook retreated to 3.3% after spiking to 3.9% in May. That longer-term moderation is meaningful -- it suggests households see the worst of the energy shock as temporary.

That disconnect -- near-term pain, longer-term relative calm -- explains the rotational logic being applied by institutional capital. They are not positioning for imminent recession. They are positioning for a prolonged period of elevated near-term costs and compressed discretionary spending, where the Walmarts and Costcos of the world gain share while mid-tier consumer brands face pressure.

Technical and Positioning Context

The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is quietly becoming one of the more important charts in the market right now. Though the Nasdaq and the cap-weighted S&P 500 have struggled recently, the equal-weight index showed new strength this week, rising 0.7% Thursday even as the SPX finished slightly lower. That shows up in the breadth numbers.

The 10-year Treasury yield is the other key anchor. A dip in yields this week -- helped by falling oil prices -- gave non-tech sectors room to stabilize. If Treasury yields keep declining, it could reinforce this trend by lowering borrowing costs. Though the recent yield drop may not last and depends partly on volatile oil prices, it presents some relief for sectors like industrials and consumer discretionary.

The S&P 500 managed to close just above its 50-day moving average of roughly 7,356 on Thursday. It has not closed below that line since early April but has come close on three straight sessions. XLV (Healthcare), XLI (Industrials), and XLP (Consumer Staples) have been absorbing institutional inflows during tech selling sessions. When a sector ETF closes above VWAP on a day when the broader market falls, it signals that buyers are more committed than sellers at the margin. That is what institutional accumulation looks like in practice.

Scenario Modeling

Bull Case

Oil prices remain contained as Hormuz tensions ease. The Fed's June hawkish shift proves to be the high-water mark for rate hike expectations. Core PCE stabilizes or edges lower in coming months. Advancing shares keep outnumbering decliners, the equal-weight index extends its recent gains, and the Dow pushes further into record territory through Q3 with industrials, healthcare, and consumer defensives leading the charge.

Base Case

The rotation continues at a measured pace. Tech and AI names stabilize after their correction but do not resume prior leadership. The Fed holds through summer, then delivers one hike in Q4. Earnings season in July shows non-tech S&P 500 companies growing at a faster pace than the AI complex. The index finishes the year with sector leadership more dispersed than at any point in the past three years.

Bear Case

Inflation reaccelerates. The Fed hikes sooner or more than once. The Strait of Hormuz situation deteriorates, pushing Brent back above $100. Long-term Treasury yields climb further, raising the cost of capital across the economy. The rotation into defensives is not enough to offset index-level weakness as tech's heavy weighting drags the S&P 500 toward the 6,800-to-7,000 range.

What to Watch From Here

The most important thing happening right now is not the Nasdaq's five-day losing streak. It is the fact that the market is functioning beyond a handful of names. Broad breadth is improving. Instead of gains concentrated in a few tech giants, more companies across sectors are participating -- and that is what a healthier market looks like from the inside.

For traders, the tactical opportunity is in the sectors absorbing those flows -- specifically industrials, healthcare, and consumer staples -- while keeping size modest given the macro uncertainty hanging over every session. Risk management means understanding what could reverse it: a re-escalation in the Middle East, a hotter-than-expected inflation reading, or a Fed statement more aggressive than current expectations. Any of those could accelerate tech selling while also pulling defensives lower if macro deterioration gets severe enough.

The Dow hitting an intraday record while the Nasdaq posts its worst week in months is not a contradiction.

It is a message. And the message is that the market is broader, and more complicated, than the AI trade alone. Investors who have been treating the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq as the same thing are about to find out they are not.

This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Investing involves risk.

The Cheap Investor is a publication of Investing Media Solutions, LLC.

_{To view our full policies:}_Disclaimer_|_{Privacy Policy}_|_{Terms & Conditions}

Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here

203 N La Salle Suite 2100
Chicago , Illinois 60601, United States

sport football

Jumat, 26 Juni 2026