_{First message from our friends at Stansberry Research (Sponsor)}

Did you hear what Nvidia's CEO said?

Dear Reader,

Did you hear what Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, told podcast host Joe Rogan?

Huang, who is possibly the biggest cheerleader for AI technology on the planet, says the entire phenomenon has a single, potentially fatal flaw.

And that's the power bottleneck.

As in surging power demand.

The solution, he says, could be lots of tiny nuclear reactors.

But could he be dead wrong about that?

We recently launched an investigation into what could be another kind of power breakthrough. It's not wind or solar energy. It's not hydro power, oil, or gas.

Instead it's a radical new kind of energy that's so abundant, right here under American soil, that the U.S. government's own energy research wing claims...

"[This new form of power] could supply humanity's total energy needs for 2 million years."

Already, tech billionaires like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are pouring piles of cash into the breakthrough company leading the charge (named here).

Google, Meta, Berkshire Hathaway... even oil backers like Chevron... and senior officials with the White House and Pentagon... are all lining up to get in on this groundbreaking trade.

This is a massive new opportunity for early investors.

This brand-new presentation walks you through it, from the monolithic building in D.C. where our investigation began...

To the remote location where an energy miracle just took place...

You can get all the details – including the name of the company at the center of this world-changing discovery – here at this link.

It's free to watch.

Regards,

Whitney Tilson
Senior Analyst, Stansberry Research

_{FEATURED ARTICLE}

The $100 Oil Mirage: Why Stocks Are Rallying Even as Brent Breaks Triple Digits

By Thursday, markets had briefly priced roughly a 47% chance that the Fed would make no additional cuts at all in 2026—in other words, that rates could stay high for the rest of the year. Then Friday's softer growth backdrop and in-line PCE report knocked those odds back down to about 34.4%. That swing tells you everything you need to know about this market: investors are trapped in a tug-of-war between inflation fear and economic gravity.

That is why today's setup is so fascinating.

On one side, Brent crude traded above $100 a barrel, the first time since 2022, after the war involving Iran and damage to regional energy infrastructure intensified supply fears. Reuters reported Brent for May rose to $100.13 early Friday after peaking at $119.50 earlier in the week, with Goldman now expecting Brent to average above $100 in March.

On the other side, the latest PCE inflation report came in basically as expected. Reuters reported January 2026 headline PCE rose 0.3% month over month, core PCE rose 0.4%, headline PCE was 2.8% year over year, and core PCE was 3.1% year over year, right in line with expectations. Reuters also noted that Q4 GDP was revised down to 0.7% from 1.4%, and stocks rallied on the idea that weaker growth plus non-surprising inflation could still leave the Fed on a late-year easing path.

That is the whole market in one sentence:

Oil is screaming stagflation.
PCE is whispering "not so fast."

And this morning, the whisper is winning.

Scoreboard: what actually happened

Let's lay out the numbers cleanly.

The geopolitical side of the story is obvious. Reuters reported that Brent crude climbed above $100, the highest since mid-2022, after war-related disruption in the Middle East tightened supply expectations. Goldman lifted its March Brent outlook to above $100, while also saying that if the disruption lasts, Brent could average $93 in Q4 2026 instead of the prior $71 estimate.

The inflation side of the story looks calmer. Reuters said January PCE came in almost exactly where economists expected:

Headline PCE: +0.3% month over month
Core PCE: +0.4% month over month
Headline PCE: +2.8% year over year
Core PCE: +3.1% year over year

And the growth side of the story is where the market found relief. Reuters reported Q4 GDP was revised down to 0.7%, far below the previously reported 1.4%, while stocks rose around 0.6%, the 10-year Treasury yield fell to 4.24%, and the 2-year fell to 3.70% after the data.

That is not a normal "oil shock" response.

Normally, $100 oil should pressure stocks because it threatens margins, consumers, inflation, and the Fed's ability to ease.

But markets are not trading oil in a vacuum.

They are trading oil against the data.

And the data, for now, did not force a more hawkish Fed response.

The real reason stocks are rallying anyway

This is the unique angle that matters:

The market is not rallying because oil does not matter.

It is rallying because traders increasingly believe $100 oil may be a geopolitical spike, not a durable domestic-demand inflation spiral.

That is a huge difference.

If oil is rising because the global economy is overheating, the Fed has a bigger problem. Strong demand plus strong prices is the nightmare combo for rate cuts.

If oil is rising because of war, shipping disruptions, and temporary supply constraints, the Fed can plausibly treat some of that as a shock rather than a signal.

Reuters captured this tension last week when Fed Governor Christopher Waller described the oil-price jump as "more like a one-off event," while still acknowledging that a longer conflict could change the equation.

That distinction is why the market can rally even with literal war in the headlines.

Because right now, investors are telling themselves this story:

The oil spike is scary.
But the inflation data did not re-accelerate.
And the economy is already softening enough that the Fed may not want to lean even tighter.

This is the $100 Oil Mirage.

The price tag looks inflationary.

The market reaction is risk-on because investors do not fully believe that price tag will stick long enough to change the Fed's destination.

Why the PCE report mattered more than the oil headline

The Fed does not target Brent crude.

It targets broad inflation and labor-market conditions.

That is why PCE matters so much here. The PCE report did not tell investors inflation was beaten. It told them inflation was stable enough that the Fed did not have to panic.

That is a very different but still market-friendly conclusion.

Reuters reported that PCE met expectations, while GDP was weaker than expected. That combination created a classic "bad growth, not worse inflation" relief trade. The market interpreted the data as reducing the odds that the Fed would need to reverse course and hike again, even as oil remains elevated.

In Cheap Investor language, this is not a victory lap.

It is a repricing of the worst-case scenario.

Before the report, the fear was:

"Oil goes to $100, inflation re-accelerates, the Fed stays locked down, and risk assets get crushed."

After the report, the market's conclusion became:

"Oil may be high, but the inflation data did not worsen, growth is softer, and the Fed can probably wait."

That is enough to spark a rally.

The 47% hook is the whole story

Let's go back to that opening stat, because it is the best thermometer for this debate.

By Thursday, rate markets had briefly priced about a 47% chance of no Fed cuts at all in 2026, according to Barron's live market coverage using CME FedWatch probabilities. The Wall Street Journal separately reported that the perceived odds of no cuts had surged to about 45%, from 24% the day before and just 4% before the conflict began. Then Friday's PCE-plus-GDP mix pushed the "no cuts" probability back down to about 34.4%.

That is an enormous swing in a very short period.

And it tells you the market is extremely uncertain about which force matters more:

oil-driven inflation persistence,
or growth-driven Fed restraint.

That is why the title question matters so much.

$100 Oil vs. The Fed: Who blinks first?

Right now, the market is betting the Fed has more room to blink than oil bulls hoped.

Not because inflation is low.

Not because war risk is fake.

But because growth is soft enough that the Fed still has a reason to sit tight and maybe ease later instead of turning hawkish again.

The cheap investor angle: this is not about oil, it is about duration

Most investors frame this debate the wrong way.

They ask: "Is $100 oil bullish or bearish?"

That is too simple.

The real question is: How long does the market think $100 oil lasts?

Because if Brent above $100 is temporary, the market can discount it.

If it lasts long enough to bleed into gasoline, freight, food, and inflation expectations for several months, the Fed problem gets much larger.

Reuters noted that gasoline prices had already surged 20% to $3.58 per gallon since the war began, according to AAA data cited in a Reuters inflation report earlier this week. Economists told Reuters that the March CPI print could rise by as much as 1.0% if the energy shock persists.

That means today's rally is not a declaration that everything is fine.

It is a conditional bet:

"We think the oil shock is real, but not yet durable enough to overpower cooling growth and stable PCE."

That is a very different proposition.

And it helps explain why cyclical and risk-sensitive assets can bounce in the face of ugly headlines.

Markets do not wait for certainty.

They trade the second derivative.

Right now, the second derivative is saying:

inflation did not get worse in the latest Fed-preferred report,
growth got worse,
and the oil shock may still be treated as external and transitory.

The macro chessboard: what the Fed actually sees

The Fed is looking at three moving pieces.

1. Inflation is still above target

Core PCE at 3.1% is not mission accomplished. It is still well above the Fed's 2% target. That means policymakers do not have unlimited flexibility.

2. Growth is losing altitude

Q4 GDP revised down to 0.7% is not catastrophic, but it is a reminder that the economy is not roaring. That weakens the case for a fresh hawkish turn, especially if consumer demand starts cracking.

3. Oil is a wild card, not a verdict

Oil above $100 is dangerous, but even Goldman's revised forecast still assumes a retreat toward the low $70s later this year if the disruption eases. That matters because the Fed is less likely to overreact to an oil spike it believes may reverse.

This is why the market can rally on a day when the headlines look objectively terrible.

Because the data did not force the Fed into a more aggressive stance.

And as long as that remains true, stocks can keep treating the war shock as scary but not thesis-destroying.

A unique perspective: the market is rallying because the shock is external

Here is the deeper point I think the tape is trying to communicate:

The market is far more forgiving of inflation when it comes from an external commodity shock than when it comes from overheated domestic demand.

Why?

Because external shocks can reverse faster than wage-price spirals.

If the inflation scare is driven by:

too-strong hiring,
too-strong spending,
too-strong credit,
and too-hot services inflation,

the Fed has to do the work.

If the scare is driven by:

war,
shipping disruption,
tanker attacks,
and oil transit bottlenecks,

the Fed may be able to wait and see.

That does not mean the outcome is harmless.

It means the policy reaction function is different.

And markets care about the reaction function more than the headline itself.

That is why the S&P can rally while Brent is at $100.

The market is not ignoring the shock.

It is categorizing it.

Bull, base, and bear

Bull case

Oil stays elevated for a short period but fails to bleed meaningfully into broader inflation. Core inflation remains stable, growth stays soft, and the Fed retains room to ease later in 2026. In that case, Friday's rally makes sense: risk assets are discounting a late-year easing path rather than a new inflation cycle. Reuters' reporting on in-line PCE, softer GDP, and economists still looking for a June-or-later cut supports that interpretation.

Base case

Oil remains volatile, inflation stays sticky, and the Fed mostly waits. That would leave the market chopping between relief rallies and energy-driven selloffs. This may be the most realistic near-term scenario: no immediate Fed rescue, but no forced hawkish pivot either. The swing from roughly 47% to 34.4% odds of no cuts this year captures exactly that indecision.

Bear case

Brent above $100 proves durable, gasoline and freight costs climb further, and the March and April inflation prints worsen. In that scenario, the "mirage" disappears. The market would have to reprice toward fewer or no cuts, and the Fed could be boxed into staying restrictive much longer. Reuters' note that gasoline had already jumped 20% since the war began shows how quickly that risk can build.

Is this rally rational?

Yes, but only conditionally.

It is rational if you believe three things:

Core inflation staying at 3.1% instead of surprising higher matters more than the oil headline.
GDP at 0.7% means growth is already fragile enough to limit Fed hawkishness.
Brent above $100 is not a permanent new baseline.

If those three hold, this morning's rally is not crazy at all.

It is the market saying:

"We see the war.
We see the oil.
We also see an economy too soft for the Fed to panic."

That is a reasonable conclusion.

But it is not a durable conclusion unless the next inflation prints cooperate.

Cheap Investor action plan

This is not a time to chase the obvious headline.

The obvious headline is "Oil at $100."

The smarter trade is to watch what that headline does to the Fed path.

If the "no cuts in 2026" odds start climbing back toward the 45%-47% zone and stay there, the market's relief trade probably starts to wobble. If those odds keep falling from Friday's 34.4%, the rally can keep breathing.

So the right checklist is:

Watch oil, yes.
But watch the rate path more closely.

Because this market is not trading crude directly.

It is trading what crude does to Fed expectations.

What I'd watch next

First, whether Brent stays above $100 or slips back. Goldman still expects prices to move lower later in the year absent a prolonged disruption.

Second, whether gasoline keeps rising from the recent $3.58 level Reuters cited. A sustained move there matters more politically and economically than Brent alone.

Third, whether the "no cuts in 2026" probability rebuilds toward the high-40s or keeps fading from Friday's 34.4%.

Fourth, whether the next CPI and PCE reports show actual pass-through from energy into broader inflation.

Fifth, whether Fed officials keep talking like Waller did—treating the oil move as a possible one-off—or begin sounding more alarmed.

Bottom line

The market is rallying this morning not because war does not matter, and not because $100 oil is bullish.

It is rallying because the latest PCE report did not force a more hawkish Fed conclusion, while weaker GDP gave investors another reason to believe policy can still ease later in 2026. Core PCE at 3.1% matched expectations. GDP at 0.7% was weak. And the odds of no cuts this year fell back to 34.4% after briefly touching roughly 45%-47%.

That is the $100 Oil Mirage.

The oil price looks terrifying.
The Fed signal looks less so.
And for now, markets care more about the Fed signal.

So who blinks first?

Today, the market is betting it will be oil, not the Fed.

Disclaimer: This editorial is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Always conduct independent research before making financial decisions.

_{IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER}
_{Investing Media Solutions, LLC ("IMS"), the owner of this website (the "Website"), cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in any article, email, newsletter, or other publication posted on or viewed in connection with this website (the "Publications"). The author or authors of those Publications are solely responsible for their contents. IMS has not done any research or due diligence into the markets, industries, or companies which may appear or be mentioned in the Publications.}_{IMS will NOT be liable for any loss or damage caused by a reader's reliance on information posted on the Website or contained in the Publications.}

_{FOR EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE.}
_{This Website and the Publications are for educational and informational purposes only. This Website and the Publications do not purport to be a complete analysis of any company's financial position. This Website, the Publications or any statements made in the Publications are not, and should not be construed to be, personalized investment advice directed to or appropriate for any particular individual.}_{This Website or the statements made in the Publications should NOT be relied upon for purposes of transacting in any securities posted on the Website or mentioned in the Publications, nor should they be construed as a personalized recommendation to you to buy, sell, or hold any position in any security posted on this Website or mentioned in any Publications.}

_{SUBSTANTIAL RISK IN INVESTMENT.}
_{Any individual who chooses to invest in any securities including those mentioned in the Publications should do so with caution.}_{Investing or transacting in securities involves substantial risk; you may lose some, all, or possibly more than your original investment.}_{Readers bear responsibility for their own investment research and decisions and should review all investment decisions with a licensed or registered investment professional.}

_{NOT AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR OR REGISTERED BROKER}
_{Neither IMS nor any of its respective owners or employees are registered or licensed as a securities broker-dealer, broker, an investment advisor, or an investment advisor representative with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), any state securities regulatory authority, or any self-regulatory organization.}

_{To more fully understand our Website, please review our full disclaimer located at:}_{https://thecheapinvestor.com/disclaimer/}

_{At The Cheap Investor, it's our mission to create and provide a community that helps you invest and understand stocks. When TheCheapInvestor was established, we wanted to make the community an inclusive place where investors can come to get ahead! Not just help them with daily stock picks. The Cheap Investor are provided to you for information only and should not be considered as a stock or investment advisor. The Cheap Investor may make available certain information related to trading strategies and stock prices for educational and information purposes only; any information made available should not be construed as an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any company or security. By visiting this site or using the training materials, you acknowledge and agree that any reliance upon the content or data available through The Cheap Investor is at your own sole risk. You are strongly advised to use your own judgment, research, and consult a professional advisor.}

_{Over the years, and with thousands of followers that use our stock picks daily, we promise to always aim to get better at what we do every single day! In addition, our primary focus is on our communication with you. It's really important to us that every time you come to us, you end up leaving with the help you came for to take your investment portfolio to new levels.}

_{We particularly appreciate when our following provides feedback via testimonials, reviews, and comments left on our site or social media accounts. Because with that feedback, we can use it to make your next visit to our site even better than the last!}

_{Since we put so much effort into the relationship with you, we hope that any investment in us is exactly the way you hoped it would be. Because by choosing to go with}_{https://TheCheapInvestor.com/}_{, it's our promise that we provide a community you will come back to over and over again.}

_{Now, as much as we care about making investors more successful, we also care about your privacy. TheCheapInvestor is owned and operated by}_{TheCheapInvestor}_website.

_{We're committed to the right to your privacy and strive to provide a safe and secure user experience. Our Privacy Policy explains how we collect, store and use personal information, provided by you on our website.}

_{What Information Do We Collect?}

_{When you visit our Web site you may provide us with two types of information: personal information you knowingly choose to disclose that is collected on an individual basis and Web site use information collected on an aggregate basis as you and others browse our Web site.}

_{For example, you may need to provide the following information: • Name • Website URL information • Email address • Home and business phone number}

_{In addition to providing the foregoing information, if you choose to correspond further with us through email, we may retain the content of your email messages together with your email address and our responses. We provide the same protections for these electronic communications that we employ in the maintenance of information received by mail and telephone. It also explains important information that ensures we won't abuse the information that you provide to us in good faith. By accessing and using our website, you can trust that what you want to be kept private, will be kept private. If at any time, you would like to read our Privacy Policy and get a better understanding of your rights and liabilities under the law.}

_{Feel free to visit our site, find the privacy policy in the footer and read it. If there is something you are concerned about or wish to get more clarity on, please let us know by contacting us at}_{support@thecheapinvestor.com}_{. The Privacy Policy also informs you of how to notify us to stop using your personal information. If you wish to view our official policies, please visit our website}_{https://TheCheapInvestor.com/}

_{At The Cheap Investor, we are strongly committed to protecting your privacy and providing a safe & high-quality online experience for all of our visitors. We understand that you care about how the information you provide to us is used and shared. We have developed a Privacy Policy to inform you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of information we receive from users of our website. The Cheap Investor operates the Website.}

_Our_{Privacy Policy}_{, along with our}_{Term & Conditions}_{, governs your use of this site. By using}_{https://TheCheapInvestor/}_{, or by accepting the Terms of Use (via opt-in, checkbox, pop-up, or clicking an email link confirming the same), you agree to be bound by our Terms & Conditions and our Privacy Policy. If you have provided personal, billing, or other voluntarily provided information, you may access, review, and make changes to it via instructions found on the Website or by emailing us at}_{support@thecheapinvestor.com}_{. To manage your receipt of marketing and non-transactional communications, you may unsubscribe by clicking the "unsubscribe" link located on the bottom of any marketing email. Emails related to the purchase or delivery of orders are provided automatically – Customers are not able to opt out of transactional emails. We will try to accommodate any requests related to the management of Personal Information in a timely manner. However, it is not always possible to completely remove or modify information in our databases (for example, if we have a legal obligation to keep it for certain timeframes, for example). If you have any questions, simply reply to this email or visit our website to view our official policies.}

Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here

203 N La Salle Suite 2100
Chicago , Illinois 60601, United States

sport football

Jumat, 13 Maret 2026

$100 Oil vs. The Fed: Who Blinks First?