First a message from our friends at The Oxford Club (Sponsor) |
Dear Reader, |
Mitt Romney turned $450,000 into as much as $100 million in 15 years. |
Peter Thiel turned $2,000 into $5 billion between 1999 and 2021. |
Both inside their retirement accounts. |
How is that even possible? |
They both used the same trick – a type of investment that regular Americans weren't allowed to touch. |
For decades, it was locked away. Reserved for the ultra-wealthy. |
But Trump just signed an executive order that opened it up to everyone. |
And there's one fund that gives you direct access. |
Trump himself has up to $25 million in it. |
My colleague Alexander Green says it could be the best opportunity he's seen in his entire career. |
Click here to see his full presentation – and learn how you can get in for less than $20. |
Good investing, |
Rachel Gearhart
Publisher,The Oxford Club |
|
BONUS ARTICLE |
Block Fired 4,000 People. Dell Sold the "AI Engines." The Market Cheered Both. |
Most people are going to misread today's tape as "AI is bullish again." |
That's too lazy. |
The better (and more uncomfortable) read is this: |
The market is no longer rewarding companies for using AI to grow.
It's rewarding them for using AI to shrink. |
Two of the loudest signals hit at the same time: |
Dell (DELL) surged because it sells the hardware engines powering the AI capex cycle. Block (XYZ) surged because it's openly treating AI as a lever to reduce human overhead—cutting 4,000+ jobs (~40% of workforce) and telling the world this is how companies will be run going forward.
|
That's the "Dorsey Doctrine." |
And whether you love it or hate it, it's investable. |
Let's break down what actually happened, what the market is really saying, and where the "cheap" angles hide. |
|
Scoreboard: What happened (and why it matters) |
1) Block: the cleanest "AI → headcount → margins" headline yet |
Block said it will cut over 4,000 jobs, nearly halving the workforce, explicitly tying the shift to embedding AI tools and smaller teams. The stock reaction was immediate: Reuters reported +25% after-hours on the announcement, and then +16%+ in Friday trading. The numbers investors anchored on: Block guided to 26% adjusted operating margin for the year, versus 20% in 2025 (per Reuters). Reuters also noted Block's headcount went from about 3,800 (2019) to 10,000+ (2025)—today's cuts drag it back toward pandemic-era scale.
|
Cheap Investor translation: The stock didn't rally because Wall Street suddenly got religion on growth.
It rallied because the cost structure got rewritten. |
|
2) Dell: hardware wins because AI spend is real, large, and near-term |
Dell is the other side of the same coin: capex is moving from "AI narrative" to purchase orders. |
From Dell's results coverage: |
Q4 revenue: $33.38B, +39% YoY Q4 profit: $2.26B, +47% FY revenue: $113.54B, +19% FY profit: $5.94B, +30%
|
And the "AI engine" specifics: |
Infrastructure Solutions Group revenue: $19.6B, +73% Servers/networking revenue inside that segment: +342% (per the same report) Dell cited $64.1B in AI orders, 4,000+ AI customers, and $43B AI backlog. Dell's outlook: FY27 revenue $138B–$142B, and the stock was up nearly 22% (to about $148) by Friday's close in one major recap.
|
Cheap Investor translation: Dell rallied because the market believes the AI buildout is not theoretical.
It's backlog + guidance + margin protection. |
|
The Real Reason: the market is rewarding "shrink" more than "grow" |
Here's the viral insight in plain English: |
In 2024–2025, AI was pitched as "revenue expansion." |
In early 2026, AI is increasingly being priced as "overhead elimination." |
Why? |
Because in a higher-rate world, investors pay up for: |
|
"AI for productivity" is nice. |
"AI as a permanent reduction in payroll + layers + cycle time" is a rerating catalyst. |
Block basically walked onstage and said the quiet part out loud: |
A smaller team using intelligence tools can do more—and most companies are late to realizing it. |
That's not a slogan. |
That's a new valuation model. |
|
What the market is really saying (the mechanism) |
Think of the tape as two separate auctions: |
Auction #1: Who sells the AI engines? |
|
Dell is getting paid because it sits directly in the "buy the shovels" lane—backlog and orders make this concrete. |
Auction #2: Who uses AI to remove cost fastest? |
|
Block is getting paid because the margin math is immediate (26% target vs 20% prior-year) and the cut is large enough to change the income statement, not just the PR deck. |
The key signal for investors:
The market is treating "AI-driven restructuring" like a durable factor—similar to how it treated "cloud migration" in the 2010s. |
|
The Cheap Angle: where value investors can play this without buying hype |
Let's be honest: you can chase "AI winners" all day and still overpay. |
So here's the Cheap Investor filter for this theme: |
The Cheaplist Quality Screen |
You want companies where the story is supported by measurable proof, not vibes: |
Visible demand (orders/backlog) or visible efficiency (margin guide) Near-term cash conversion (not "someday TAM") A rerating catalyst you can track quarterly Downside defined by fundamentals (not just momentum)
|
Now, the watchlist—built from today's two loudest tells. |
|
Hidden value plays (under-the-radar setups) with specific "trackable" proof points |
1) Dell (DELL): the "AI engines" winner with tangible backlog gravity |
Why it fits the doctrine: AI spend shows up as orders, backlog, and guidance. |
Data points to anchor on: |
FY revenue $113.54B (+19%) and Q4 revenue $33.38B (+39%). AI indicators: $64.1B AI orders, $43B AI backlog, 4,000+ AI customers. FY27 outlook: $138B–$142B revenue.
|
Cheap Investor framing:
Not "Dell is an AI company."
Dell is a throughput allocator: it gets paid when hyperscalers write checks. |
Risk: If the AI buildout gets delayed or pricing gets pressured, hardware moves fast in both directions. |
|
2) Block (XYZ): the purest "AI → margin expansion" trade in public markets right now |
Why it fits the doctrine: It's explicitly shrinking the org chart to improve margins. |
Data points to anchor on: |
4,000+ job cuts (~40%) tied to an AI overhaul. Margin guide: 26% adjusted operating margin vs 20% in 2025 (Reuters). Stock reaction: +25% after-hours, +16%+ next day (Reuters).
|
Cheap Investor framing:
This is not a "growth rebound" trade.
This is a "cost of revenue + opex reset" trade. |
Risk: Long-term execution—cutting cost is easy once; sustaining product momentum afterward is harder (Reuters notes the long-term impact is uncertain). |
|
3) The under-discussed metric: "gross profit per employee" becomes a factor |
Reuters noted JPMorgan's angle: Block's headcount reset could make it stand out on gross profit per employee relative to peers. |
Cheap Investor takeaway:
In 2026, the market is increasingly valuing output per employee like it values margins. |
This matters beyond Block—because it suggests a new screen: |
"Which companies have high labor intensity and credible paths to automate?" |
|
|
That's where "cheap" opportunities can emerge—especially in businesses that are still being valued like they need more people to scale. |
|
Bull / Base / Bear scenarios |
Bull case: "Shrink beats grow" becomes a sustained rerating factor |
What needs to happen: |
AI tools keep improving workflow productivity Companies prove they can cut headcount without breaking growth Investors reward margin expansion more than topline stories
|
What wins: |
|
|
Base case: short-term pop, then the market demands proof |
Most likely path: |
First the tape rewards the announcement Then it demands quarterly evidence: margins, retention, product velocity
|
What wins: |
|
|
Bear case: "Overhead cuts" become a red flag for underlying demand |
Break conditions: |
Cuts signal demand softness, not efficiency Product execution slows after layoffs AI capex slows or gets repriced
|
What wins: |
|
|
Action plan for tomorrow (and next week) |
1) Don't buy the narrative—buy the proof |
|
2) Use a scale-in framework (no hero entries) |
Starter position after the first consolidation Add only if the stock holds higher lows Add again only after the next earnings confirms the thesis
|
3) Watch the market's tell: is it rewarding layoffs broadly? |
If the tape keeps rewarding "cost-out + AI" announcements, this becomes a factor trade. |
If not, it was a one-week shock. |
|
Cheap Investor checklist / scorecard |
Track these 8 items: |
DELL AI backlog + AI orders cadence (does backlog stay elevated?) DELL Infrastructure Solutions growth (does AI keep pulling the segment?) XYZ operating margin progress toward 26% XYZ Cash App and Square growth trends (does product hold while org shrinks?) Market breadth: do "efficiency winners" outperform on down tape? Credit conditions: cost-cutting trades love stable financing Wage inflation / labor market: makes automation ROI more attractive One red flag: "stock up on layoffs, then guidance down next quarter"
|
|
Bottom line |
The Dorsey Doctrine is simple: 2026 is a war on human overhead. |
Dell is getting paid because it builds the engines of AI capex—$113.54B revenue last year, $138B–$142B guided, plus $43B AI backlog and $64.1B AI orders. |
Block is getting paid because it's openly converting AI into margin expansion—4,000+ job cuts (~40%) and a 26% margin target vs 20% in 2025. |
The market's message is not subtle: |
It's not rewarding AI for growth. It's rewarding AI for shrink. |
|
|
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. Always do your own research before making investment decisions. |
|
|
|
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar