Selasa, 20 Agustus 2019

Will 5G Really Be a Health Hazard?

Trouble viewing this e-mail? Click here to read it online

CASEY DAILY DISPATCH - Casey Research

Chris’ note: Chris Reilly here, managing editor of Casey Daily Dispatch. Regular readers know I’ve recently been turning to my friend and colleague Jeff Brown to show you one of the most exciting investment trends on our radar: fifth-generation (5G) wireless technology.

I can’t think of anybody who knows more about this opportunity than Jeff. He’s a firm believer that 5G technology will have a big impact on our daily lives… and that investors who aren’t paying attention will lose out on huge gains.

But some of our readers are worried that 5G could pose a problem for your health. Jeff has looked into this concern… and what he found may surprise you…


Will 5G Really Be a Health Hazard?

By Jeff Brown, editor, Exponential Tech Investor

Jeff Brown

As the 5G wireless infrastructure buildout swings into high gear, one concern keeps popping up in the feedback sent my way.

Many people worry that this new generation of wireless technology will also bring a wave of health issues – ranging from cancer to nosebleeds to autism…

From Lauren S.: I'm responding to the article about 5G technology. I'm wondering, what do you think of the concerns that 5G technology is hazardous to our health?

From Shawn S.: I’ve seen zero coverage on 5G health hazards. But I don’t believe it’ll be harmless to human health at all…

From Tina C.: 5G is a killer. Do your research! Geez, I really thought the most awake and intelligent people would know just how bad 5G really is for humanity and the planet.

From Christen P.: With regards to the 5G health concerns, couldn’t U.S. interests be motivated to quash studies researching the safety and potential health consequences of the technology?

Now, let me say outright: I don’t believe 5G poses a health risk. And in fact, research supports that. Many of these same health concerns emerged during the rise of 4G – yet the problems failed to materialize.

However, I understand that new technologies can be frightening, especially to anyone who isn’t a scientist or researcher.

But here’s why I’m so certain that the 5G fears will be another nonevent…

Recommended Link

[REVEALED] The $15 Trillion Secret Inside Amazon’s Warehouses

image

According to recent reports, Amazon is quietly testing out a controversial new technology in 830 warehouses.

Industry insiders are already calling it “the next big thing”… “bigger than the internet” and unlike “anything we’ve ever seen before.”

Stocks of companies working on this technology are exploding right now – with gains like 142%... 91%... even 171%.

And this could be just the beginning…

Go here to find out more
--

The Safety of 5G

You see, mobile phones emit radiofrequency radiation (radio waves) – a form of non-ionizing radiation. This kind of radiation is normal. It’s all around us. Non-ionizing radiation only has enough energy to excite a molecule. And the byproduct is merely heat.

But ionizing radiation is higher frequency – and can be a severe health hazard. It can cause radiation sickness, burns, cancer, and even genetic damage. Ionizing radiation is the kind of radiation we find with using nuclear power.

So it’s important to be clear that 5G wireless tech is a form of non-ionizing radiation. (And for that matter, so is the current 4G wireless tech and every other generation prior to that.)

Now, since radio frequencies (RF) have been used in radio, TV, wireless networks, and many other services for decades… this is a careful area of study for regulatory agencies to ensure that RF waves have no negative impact on consumers’ health.

To be very clear, there’s no conclusive evidence that RF wireless tech causes any side effects in consumers who use – or are even in the presence of – wireless networks.

A study in Denmark analyzed the records of over 358,000 mobile phone subscribers with brain tumor incidence data from the Danish Cancer Registry. The analysis found “no association between cell phone use and the incidence of glioma, meningioma, or acoustic neuroma, even among people who had been cell phone subscribers for 13 or more years.”

Yet in 2018, there was some very bad reporting concerning a study on the effects of high RF energy exposure on rats. It found that male rats exposed to radio waves developed schwannomas (small tumors) on their hearts at statistically higher rates than the control group.

However, mice and female rats exposed to the same radio waves did not develop any of these small tumors. (Ironically, the animals exposed to high RF radiation lived longer than the control animals that weren’t.)

For obvious reasons, I’ll continue tracking this topic closely as 5G wireless networks become more widespread.

But it’s important to note that all 5G-enabled smartphones will still meet the safety limits and standards set by the Federal Communications Commission, which is informed by the Food and Drug Administration.

But now, I’d like to focus on a different question.

Where did this idea of dangerous 5G even come from? How did an improvement in our wireless technology generate such anxiety?

I think I know the answer…

Recommended Link

Trump's OWN book... claim yours for $1!

ad_img

Donald Trump laid out his brilliant ideas about America’s financial system in this book long before he was president.

He wrote it with the #1 best-selling author in personal finance, Robert Kiyosaki…

And it’s designed to help everyday Americans retire wealthy!

Click here now to claim your copy for $1.

If you only have a few thousand saved for retirement…

Or simply want to learn why Trump will win again in 2020

Check out more details on this $1 book offer now
--

Nefarious Propaganda?

You might be skeptical of what I have to say, but please keep an open mind…

Deploying 5G wireless networks is such a competitive advantage that it’s become a race among countries to be the first to build them out. Governments around the world recognize their nations will become more competitive the sooner they build out these networks.

For example, this February, Russia launched its own 5G program. But its progress is far behind the U.S. or China…

That’s why RT America (part of the RT network funded by Russia’s government) aired a segment titled “A Dangerous ‘Experiment on Humanity.’” The media piece outlined how 5G is connected to everything from brain cancer, to infertility, and even to Alzheimer’s, despite having no scientific support.

Now, we already know that the Russian government has been proven to have highly structured programs for meddling in U.S. affairs and influencing public thinking. RT is widely considered to be a propaganda machine supporting Russia’s interests.

And what better way to slow down America’s 5G rollout – and give Russia time to catch up – than spread misinformation and doubt about the safety of the technology?

You might be doubtful. But keep in mind, 5G is expected to unleash an estimated $12 trillion in wealth in the coming years. So whichever country sets the 5G precedent will be the economic powerhouse of the next decade.

And we should ask ourselves this: What wouldn’t a government (with questionable ethics) do to secure that advantage?

Regards,

Jeff Brown
Editor, Exponential Tech Investor

P.S. There’s another insight you should take away from this: If world governments are waging economic warfare to secure 5G dominance, it suggests how transformative this technology really is.

And investing in key 5G companies is a once-in-a-decade opportunity. Smart investors stand to make 10 times their money with a few key investments.

That’s why I’m hosting my free 5G Investment Summit this Thursday, August 22, at 8 p.m. ET. I’ll reveal my stock-picking method for finding the fastest-moving 5G stocks. Plus, I’ll even give you the name of my No. 1 5G company to add to your watchlist.

I haven’t revealed this research anywhere else. So be sure to reserve your spot to claim it right here.


Reader Mailbag

Today in the mailbag, a reader responds to E.B. Tucker’s essay on his antique furniture hobby… and shares why you can’t always judge an item’s value by its price tag…

Interesting article from E.B. Tucker about his chairs. I suppose various items are worth differing amounts to their owners as to how much pleasure they derive from them. I have a framed pair of exotic feathers that are used to tie salmon flies. Individual portions (e.g. 2-3 inches) may cost a few British pounds.

But I acquired them from a reputable U.K. fishing shop owner as part of a retirement purchase. They meant quite a lot to him, as they were displayed on his shop wall. Now, I have them and am looking at them as I type this response. They don't look like much, but to me, they are stunning, and an object of beauty.

You see, that is part of the passion of collecting items that mean a lot to an individual, but not necessarily to everyone. Keep up these interesting articles on collecting items of art. E.B. did some a few weeks ago on paintings. Many thanks.

– John

You can read about E.B.’s recent experiences with collecting art here and here. And as always, send any questions, comments, or concerns to feedback@caseyresearch.com.


In Case You Missed It…

This Week: Brand New 5G Summit with Jeff Brown

Jeff Brown is one of America’s leading 5G experts. But this Thursday, he’s making his biggest 5G prediction yet.

If you’re looking for the chance to double, triple, or even quadruple your money — multiple times — this is a must-attend event.

Click here to register for FREE.

image

Share FACEBOOK
Tweet TWITTER

Like what you’re reading? Send us your thoughts by clicking here.

© Casey Research, LLC
455 NE 5th Ave, Suite D317
Delray Beach, FL 33483
www.caseyresearch.com

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar